Dueling Network Forums
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

all out att ruling ...is this right ?

2 posters

Go down

Solved all out att ruling ...is this right ?

Post  raidou 2011-11-29, 22:07

i checked it and


its effects uses the chain but needs to be face up on the field



are there any other cards with chainable effects but at the same time needing to be face up ?



and another ruling it will ALWAYS activate even if the monster is special summoned in att position

i want to confirm all those rulings because i found them on wikia

and the only rules it has are the UDE ones and people are trying to hide behind that fact when i quote those rulings
raidou
raidou


Posts : 967
Join date : 2011-06-02

Back to top Go down

Solved Re: all out att ruling ...is this right ?

Post  BlackwingRa 2011-11-29, 22:17

I know 1 card that almost similar to this is Appropriate.
And although it is previous rulings, it doesn't mean it's wrong.
All those rulings don't conflict with mechanic or anything else, so they still hold true.
BlackwingRa
BlackwingRa


Posts : 832
Birthday : 1991-10-02
Join date : 2011-05-19

Back to top Go down

Solved Re: all out att ruling ...is this right ?

Post  raidou 2011-11-29, 23:21

the part i found odd is


its effect uses the chain and all cont traps i know with chainable effects didnt need to be face up to activate
raidou
raidou


Posts : 967
Join date : 2011-06-02

Back to top Go down

Solved Re: all out att ruling ...is this right ?

Post  BlackwingRa 2011-11-29, 23:37

Continuous Trap Card always need to be face-up to activate. (Unless there's some effect on that card that activates off the field)
BlackwingRa
BlackwingRa


Posts : 832
Birthday : 1991-10-02
Join date : 2011-05-19

Back to top Go down

Solved Re: all out att ruling ...is this right ?

Post  raidou 2011-11-30, 03:40

that rule changed a long time ago

i was a little confused , i thought cont traps with chainable effects were included on the rule change

but it only includes the ones with optional effects not the mandatory ones


raidou
raidou


Posts : 967
Join date : 2011-06-02

Back to top Go down

Solved Re: all out att ruling ...is this right ?

Post  BlackwingRa 2011-11-30, 04:53

There's no on-field effect that is activated from an off-field card, and Continuous Spell/Trap also need to be face-up to resolve effects.
BlackwingRa
BlackwingRa


Posts : 832
Birthday : 1991-10-02
Join date : 2011-05-19

Back to top Go down

Solved Re: all out att ruling ...is this right ?

Post  raidou 2011-11-30, 11:00

im talking about activation not resolution


all out att needs to be face up when the monster is summoned
raidou
raidou


Posts : 967
Join date : 2011-06-02

Back to top Go down

Solved Re: all out att ruling ...is this right ?

Post  BlackwingRa 2011-11-30, 20:07

Let's say you activate this card in response to a successful summon. If you activate this card in response to a successful summon, that's mean the summon's already happened, and you cannot affect that monster. It's just like Appropriate, you can't draw on the initial activation, but after that it's ok.
BlackwingRa
BlackwingRa


Posts : 832
Birthday : 1991-10-02
Join date : 2011-05-19

Back to top Go down

Solved Re: all out att ruling ...is this right ?

Post  raidou 2011-11-30, 20:44

thats why it confused me


appropiate draw 2 card effect cant be chained to



but this effect uses the chain and activates even if the monster is summoned in att position i love that part
raidou
raidou


Posts : 967
Join date : 2011-06-02

Back to top Go down

Solved Re: all out att ruling ...is this right ?

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum