Re: Most Ridiculous Thing Somebody Has Said To You On Duel Network

**just_a_null** 2012-01-11, 20:58

Good news! Apparently, if anything goes wrong in our turn- We misplay some tuners like Krebons, for example, we can just take it back.

Most Ridiculous Thing Somebody Has Said To You On Duel Network - Page 3 6IVS2

**Optimus96** 2012-01-11, 21:07

Whats with Exodia players looking at their deck?

Spoiler:

P.S. The reason why he left the duel becuase I summoned Trish.

**plsgiveme500k** 2012-01-11, 23:08

Optimus96 wrote:Whats with Exodia players looking at their deck?

Spoiler:

P.S. The reason why he left the duel becuase I summoned Trish.

Hmm... I think he run because of you suddenly drop a 2700 attack monster, but not the effect, I am 60% sure a beginner level like him don't know how to read card...

**Yo guyz** 2012-01-11, 23:15

Optimus96 wrote:Whats with Exodia players looking at their deck?

Spoiler:

P.S. The reason why he left the duel becuase I summoned Trish.

People with exclamation marks in their name with spaces like that are trolls. He was just effing with you.

**Miror B.** 2012-01-11, 23:42

plsgiveme500k wrote:
Optimus96 wrote:Whats with Exodia players looking at their deck?

Spoiler:

P.S. The reason why he left the duel becuase I summoned Trish.

Hmm... I think he run because of you suddenly drop a 2700 attack monster, but not the effect, I am 60% sure a beginner level like him don't know how to read card...

Nah, everyone should know what Trish does. And an Exodia player shouldn't care how much attack you have since Exodia doesn't really care about Life Points.

**plsgiveme500k** 2012-01-11, 23:55

Miror B. wrote:
plsgiveme500k wrote:
Optimus96 wrote:Whats with Exodia players looking at their deck?

Spoiler:

P.S. The reason why he left the duel becuase I summoned Trish.

Hmm... I think he run because of you suddenly drop a 2700 attack monster, but not the effect, I am 60% sure a beginner level like him don't know how to read card...

Nah, everyone should know what Trish does. And an Exodia player shouldn't care how much attack you have since Exodia doesn't really care about Life Points.

In my awful pass in traditional... I was a six samurai player, when I drop kageki then drop kagemusha, opponent always ask how I summon 2 monster in one turn? When I drop great shogun, opponent always said that level7 monster need tribute 2 monster to summon... And when I drop Trish, I want my opponent banish their card from field/hand/grave, opponent always ask how/why, I told them read card effect, they always reply me "I don't know"

**Optimus96** 2012-01-12, 09:53

plsgiveme500k wrote:
Optimus96 wrote:Whats with Exodia players looking at their deck?

Spoiler:

P.S. The reason why he left the duel becuase I summoned Trish.

Hmm... I think he run because of you suddenly drop a 2700 attack monster, but not the effect, I am 60% sure a beginner level like him don't know how to read card...

I pretty sure he know what Trish did. Just becuase he had only 3 cards in his hand and I bet you they where all Exodia peices thats why he quit.

**C/a/boose** 2012-01-12, 15:48

I summon Black Rose and use its eff.
My opponent chains Compulsory Evac
He says Black Roses effect doesn't go off.

after trying to explain to him I finally give in and continue the duel.

Later I tribute Sangan to summon my Jinzo, he says that Sangan doesn't get its effect because it misses timing.
I called a mod in and my opponent was frustrated when he found out he was wrong.
He started crying to the mod about how I had been mean to him.

**Miror B.** 2012-01-12, 15:49

plsgiveme500k wrote:In my awful pass in traditional...

Traditional. Got it.

**dabestgamer** 2012-01-12, 20:33

C/a/boose wrote:I summon Black Rose and use its eff.
My opponent chains Compulsory Evac
He says Black Roses effect doesn't go off.

after trying to explain to him I finally give in and continue the duel.

Later I tribute Sangan to summon my Jinzo, he says that Sangan doesn't get its effect because it misses timing.
I called a mod in and my opponent was frustrated when he found out he was wrong.
He started crying to the mod about how I had been mean to him.

If I were you, I wouldn't have given in with Black Rose. If the opponent is wrong, then they are wrong. End of story.

**Optimus96** 2012-01-12, 20:51

dabestgamer wrote:
C/a/boose wrote:I summon Black Rose and use its eff.
My opponent chains Compulsory Evac
He says Black Roses effect doesn't go off.

after trying to explain to him I finally give in and continue the duel.

Later I tribute Sangan to summon my Jinzo, he says that Sangan doesn't get its effect because it misses timing.
I called a mod in and my opponent was frustrated when he found out he was wrong.
He started crying to the mod about how I had been mean to him.

If I were you, I wouldn't have given in with Black Rose. If the opponent is wrong, then they are wrong. End of story.

I agree with this guy. But sometimes you just cant reason with people.

**AhhGoodTimes** 2012-01-12, 20:59

I love giving in and letting them be wrong and then still beating them in the end. It makes things more difficult and interesting for me. Obviously I don't do this on rated though.

**Miror B.** 2012-01-12, 21:02

AhhGoodTimes wrote:I love giving in and letting them be wrong and then still beating them in the end. It makes things more difficult and interesting for me. Obviously I don't do this on rated though.

Or giving in and letting them be right, only to have an easier time.

Like in locals. I use MST, guy chains Call of the Haunted, afterwards says Doppel can summon itself even though it would miss timing.

I ditch for Quickdraw, Normal summon Ryko, go Nitro Warrior and attack his facedown monster then switch Doppel to attack for game.

**[S]tarstrike** 2012-01-12, 21:11

Lol wow I think I just noticed that this thread now only has 5 pages instead of the 40 that it used to have...that can't be right. There was so much funny stuff to read in this thread.

I did see a situation with my friend last night who was playing someone. My friend used Call Of The Haunted to bring back a monster then used it to tune for Scrap Dragon. He then tried to use the effect of Scrap Dragon on Call Of The Haunted to destroy his D.D. Warrior Lady. The opponent said that Call Of The Haunted was destroyed because using the monster for Synchro means the monster is destroyed.

**HarvesterOfSorrow** 2012-01-12, 21:12

theres 2 i saw

'i can normal summon in defence mode right?'

and

'Opp: summons, red eyes darkness metal, brings out galaxy eyes
Me: oh what am i gonna do (i have mirror force facedown)
Opp: ok now galaxy to attack your facedown
me: (activates mirror force)
Opp: (activates mirror force)
Me: what the hell are you doing
Opp: i negated your mirror force with my own, so it goes right back at you
me: uhh you cant do that
Opp: really? fine ill use galaxy effect to remove your mirror force from play
me: ...dude what

**CrimsonCalamity** 2012-01-12, 22:08

I remember some dude trying to clear my field with Torrential by sacking a fresh summon, no problem right?

Ok, so I responded by chaining Starlight Road and got out Stardust.

So then s/he decided he could chain HIS OWN Road to mine, THEN thought he could summon his own Stardust......

He responds that he "used Starlight on himself"

So the heifer wants to call an admin because apparently s/he apparently lost the ability to read...an admin never came....but I'm like "until you feel like continuing or backing up your claims, I'll be sitting back watching Jerry Springer until then."

**CheyMcFly** 2012-01-12, 22:21

CrimsonCalamity wrote:I remember some dude trying to clear my field with Torrential by sacking a fresh summon, no problem right?

Ok, so I responded by chaining Starlight Road and got out Stardust.

So then s/he decided he could chain HIS OWN Road to mine, THEN thought he could summon his own Stardust......

He responds that he "used Starlight on himself"

So the heifer wants to call an admin because apparently s/he apparently lost the ability to read...an admin never came....but I'm like "until you feel like continuing or backing up your claims, I'll be sitting back watching Jerry Springer until then."

go back a few pages, there's a picture of someone trying to chain a mirror force to a mirror force.

**C/a/boose** 2012-01-12, 22:41

I summon Summoner Monk and put it in defense mode.
My opponent starts ranting about how I broke like 3 rules.
He then rage quits.

I was so confused, I didn't even get to say anything to him.

**Galkin** 2012-01-12, 22:43

You mean the post above her's?

...(I need to duel more, no one has said anything ridiculous to me)

**dabestgamer** 2012-01-12, 22:58

Optimus96 wrote:
dabestgamer wrote:
C/a/boose wrote:I summon Black Rose and use its eff.
My opponent chains Compulsory Evac
He says Black Roses effect doesn't go off.

after trying to explain to him I finally give in and continue the duel.

Later I tribute Sangan to summon my Jinzo, he says that Sangan doesn't get its effect because it misses timing.
I called a mod in and my opponent was frustrated when he found out he was wrong.
He started crying to the mod about how I had been mean to him.

If I were you, I wouldn't have given in with Black Rose. If the opponent is wrong, then they are wrong. End of story.

I agree with this guy. But sometimes you just cant reason with people.

In which case, they can either take it up with an admin or quit. I don't let my opponents be "right" when they're not.

**itsjustjosh** 2012-01-12, 23:25

I dueled a spanish kid who didn't know any rulings. And I beat him.

In the end he left and said in spanish "your mom's a bitch," after losing a card game

**CheyMcFly** 2012-01-12, 23:48

this guy was telling me how whenever I placed a card he would hit his child. That went on for like 30minutes until I called an admin. IT was getting bad, gruesome, and very detailed. No me gusta.

**DiscordII** 2012-01-13, 00:06

CheyMcFly wrote:this guy was telling me how whenever I placed a card he would hit his child. That went on for like 30minutes until I called an admin. IT was getting bad, gruesome, and very detailed. No me gusta.

I believe that was me -__-

**ProGman** 2012-01-13, 13:35

My brother was playing this guy and well this happend. BTW this is the player name not a censoring. My brother being Needabettername.

anonymus has lost 500 life points
Needabettername: eff
Needabettername: 2100 atk
anonymus: chain
Needabettername: you cant
anonymus: is a quick spell
Needabettername: you set the spell no you have to wait a turn to use it
Needabettername: quick spells act like traps when you set them
anonymus: ahh look buddy i been doin this 4 almost 8 years now and i know when u can chain or not ok
anonymus: so fuk u bye
anonymus has left the duel

My brother MST his set Gemini Spark the turn he set it then he says chain Then there be the argument and then the rage quit.

**plsgiveme500k** 2012-01-13, 13:47

ProGman wrote:My brother was playing this guy and well this happend. BTW this is the player name not a censoring. My brother being Needabettername.

anonymus has lost 500 life points
Needabettername: eff
Needabettername: 2100 atk
anonymus: chain
Needabettername: you cant
anonymus: is a quick spell
Needabettername: you set the spell no you have to wait a turn to use it
Needabettername: quick spells act like traps when you set them
anonymus: ahh look buddy i been doin this 4 almost 8 years now and i know when u can chain or not ok
anonymus: so fuk u bye
anonymus has left the duel

My brother MST his set Gemini Spark the turn he set it then he says chain Then there be the argument and then the rage quit.

Ok... I been thinking about things like this for a long time... and I hope someone explain that why there are a lot these "weirdo" choose to rage quit instead of accept the game rules?? These game rules won't change even they keep rage quitting countless match over and over... Why they never understand this concept...?

**dabestgamer** 2012-01-13, 15:14

plsgiveme500k wrote:
ProGman wrote:My brother was playing this guy and well this happend. BTW this is the player name not a censoring. My brother being Needabettername.

anonymus has lost 500 life points
Needabettername: eff
Needabettername: 2100 atk
anonymus: chain
Needabettername: you cant
anonymus: is a quick spell
Needabettername: you set the spell no you have to wait a turn to use it
Needabettername: quick spells act like traps when you set them
anonymus: ahh look buddy i been doin this 4 almost 8 years now and i know when u can chain or not ok
anonymus: so fuk u bye
anonymus has left the duel

My brother MST his set Gemini Spark the turn he set it then he says chain Then there be the argument and then the rage quit.

Ok... I been thinking about things like this for a long time... and I hope someone explain that why there are a lot these "weirdo" choose to rage quit instead of accept the game rules?? These game rules won't change even they keep rage quitting countless match over and over... Why they never understand this concept...?

1) They don't like to be wrong or when someone tells them they're wrong.

2) They don't like to lose.

3) They don't like when both of the above happen, especially when they think their opponent is inferior.

**Drago Arcaus** 2012-01-14, 10:20

Opponent goes first. typically dustshooted and he summons earth

I summon swap frog. dump treeborn in the grave
Attack earth. then during the battle phase on my attack decleration e con earth to defence, Everything goes fine put swap back in my hand

They summon venus attack because they know I have gorz. XYZ into gachi main phase 2.

My turn. During the standby phase. Special frog. Econ the gachi. Special frog.

Opponent says lol cant... I simply say "quickplay"

They then do this

"..." your opponent has left the duel

How exactly did someone forget how cards worked within the space of a turn XD

(best part is the opponents name basically called his opponents noobs)

**shonenhikada** 2012-01-14, 10:25

"You can't negate the Special Summon of a monster by future fusion with Solemn warning". This made me lol.

**Saturn** 2012-01-14, 10:36

shonenhikada wrote:"You can't negate the Special Summon of a monster by future fusion with Solemn warning". This made me lol.

Oh how I love the irony in people posting things like this when they're in the wrong...

You can't negate a Fusion Summon by Future Fusion, you have to negate Future Fusion when it is first activated and not when its delayed effect resolves.

**Phoenix Wright** 2012-01-14, 10:57

Someone tried to special summon a dark armed dragon with 2 darks in their graveyard during their battle phase Neutral

**plsgiveme500k** 2012-01-14, 12:47

This story is kinda hilarious...

I was looking a duel in rated... I saw a duel note that write "NO EXTRA DECK"... then I go in with my Synchron Quasar Deck to duel with him... since we can ignore the deck restriction duel notes and I was curious that why he not allow people use extra deck...

Here goes the chat...
Opponent: noob, i said no extra deck, dun u see?
Me : You should know the rated duel's rules before you duel in rated....
Opponent: what f**king rules?
Me : You can't restrict opponent deck in rated duel...
Opponent: i am not using extra deck, so no ppl is allowed to use extra deck when duel with me, if u dun like, dun bothering duel me, noob, and get out of here
My : You are the one who should get out of here...
Opponent: stfu, ur mum will die in next day and u will beg me like a dog
"Opponent rage quitted*

Too bad I forgot to copy his name down, he using a dw deck and he is not allow people to use extra deck while he doesn't...

**Drago Arcaus** 2012-01-14, 13:34

Tad off topic (ok very off topic)

but 500k's sig, Rescue rabbit, gen turtle/armadillo, treeborn frog.

Why does konami hate evolution so much

**D-Shinkirou** 2012-01-14, 14:59

Yeah I love seeing random Duel Quotes. I have seen no extra, and no anti-meta like so many times.

"No inzektorz, Dino rabbit, DW, Gravekeep..."

I assume if I could have seen more it would have said this.

"No inzektorz, Dino rabbit, DW, Gravekeeper's y'know what no good decks at all you have to admit as soon as the match starts and all your reps are belong to us er... me.".

**celestialPilot** 2012-01-14, 17:55

Duel Note Hunting is one of my favorite passtimes.

See someone in rated with a duel note that says "No Inzektor, Wind-Ups, DW, etc." and I'll join them using Inzektor, Wind-Ups, DW, etc.

And then I'll point them to the rules when they complain.

**KidBlackWing** 2012-01-15, 12:25

This guy wanted me to make a draw when I CLEARLY won.
Then he had the nerve to call an admin -.-
From the looks of it he was one of those guys that try to make multiple accounts till they get really high and undefeated

**plsgiveme500k** 2012-01-15, 12:56

Well, another awful memory in traditional... opponent active Infinite Cards... then he add raigeki/darkhole/harpie dust from deck to hand with absolutely no reason... this is what he say...

Opponent: infinite card means i can get as many card as possible from my deck

I was like... Suspect

**C/a/boose** 2012-01-15, 18:15

Someone tried to make Thunder End Dragon with two Graphas one time. .-.

**storyteller** 2012-01-15, 19:05

Mods really get a few of this, don't we?

I enter a duel where a player is complaining that his opponent summoned a lv 6 monster without tribute. When I asked for an explanation, he came up with something along the lines of "I was playing by the millennium kingdom rules" ._.

Another duel, I enter and ask what's wrong. The guy goes "I cheat". Well, at least you're honest.

**dest** 2012-01-15, 20:59

hey, I've already got 4-5 pms/duels where I was greeted with "I am a problem"^^

**MrJokster** 2012-01-15, 23:45

Just had 3 duels using a little B.S. for-fun deck I made in a few minutes (Bubble Burn)

Duel #1: Guy swears up and down that Card of Sanctity is banned.

Duel #2: Opponent loses Rock-Paper-Scissors. Quits.

Duel #3: I play Heavy Storm, he chains Scapegoat with only two open monster slots. Progresses into a 10 minute discussion over how Scapegoat works. He leaves the duel after I pull up multiple sources stating that you must summon all 4 tokens.

**intothalight** 2012-01-17, 08:00

Me act just deserts response
Opp no
Me chain cease fire response
Opp no
Me chain secret barrel chain max c chain ojama trio chain chain strike he is taking the life points off as we go
Opp to chain strike solemn
Ok pay half and take game amount you lose
Opp no I don't
I call admin
Seto problem
Chains and solemn he pays life cost then resolve chain
SEto yes correct
Opp no cheat
How Seto how
Opp you bring your friend who is admin boyfriend an suk toes cheater other profanities nerd rage and quit
Me lol
Seto homeless shelters

**Drago Arcaus** 2012-01-17, 21:02

People seem to like to bend the solemns and other negations to their will

Today alone I've had people saying
I still send to grave when they negate gem-knight fusion
I've had some people just plain judgment it for some reason
Some attempting to stop the summon itself
The turn before future fusion went off. they xyzed for roach https://imgur.com/cQZDE
People claiming that solemning gem knight fusion means I cant use it again O.o
And the whole warning vs future fusion thing

Also... the above post was actually hilarious XD

**Monox D. I-Fly** 2012-01-17, 22:11

Well, I encountered cases like those at least twice. Dunno if I was right or wrong:

Case 1
I had three Star Boys on my field, so I said that their ATK was 2050. My opponent said that it didn't work like this. Their ATK should be just 1050. Which one was right?

Case 2
My opponent had two monsters and attacked my set Man-Eater Bug. However, before I flipped it, he attacked again with his other monster, resembled Direct Attack. When I flipped it, I said that he couldn't Direct Attack me anymore because I destroyed the second attacking monster with Man-Eater's Bug effect. Then he just destroyed the first one instead and said that it didn't a matter. Was he right? Or was I the right one? Does attack order affect circumstances like this?

**plsgiveme500k** 2012-01-17, 23:30

Monox D. I-Fly wrote:Well, I encountered cases like those at least twice. Dunno if I was right or wrong:

Case 1
I had three Star Boys on my field, so I said that their ATK was 2050. My opponent said that it didn't work like this. Their ATK should be just 1050. Which one was right?

Case 2
My opponent had two monsters and attacked my set Man-Eater Bug. However, before I flipped it, he attacked again with his other monster, resembled Direct Attack. When I flipped it, I said that he couldn't Direct Attack me anymore because I destroyed the second attacking monster with Man-Eater's Bug effect. Then he just destroyed the first one instead and said that it didn't a matter. Was he right? Or was I the right one? Does attack order affect circumstances like this?

For case 1... yes it does stack like active 3 solidarity...

For case 2... he can't change the man eater bug target... unless the player was play a six samurai deck...

**intothalight** 2012-01-18, 02:28

lol yes thk dark blade guy

**AsherpotterCOPY** 2012-01-18, 03:39

You can Special Summon with Archlord Kristya face-up because Kristya says neither player CAN Special Summon.

Some calls man...

**Cosmic_Fate** 2012-01-18, 03:42

if a normal summon is negated, you can normal summon once more because your first one was negated. /fail-logic

**intothalight** 2012-01-18, 04:44

lol this just happen to me with my laggia and lancing his acid golemn in damage calc and he just first tride to dark bribe after seting it that turn then he just ends his turn without killing it lol

randellrhodes: in damage calculation
randellrhodes: u take 200
randellrhodes: u caint
randellrhodes: u just set that
randellrhodes: all of your backrow was just set
randellrhodes: um no kid you attacked
randellrhodes has called an admin
randellrhodes: your monster dies
Stemikey: what
randellrhodes: you declared attack
Stemikey: how
randellrhodes: in damage calculation
randellrhodes: i activate lance
Stemikey: of what f er
randellrhodes: which makes your monster a 2200 attack
randellrhodes: then damage calculation takes place and your monster is destroyed
Shadow: whats wrong
Stemikey: after i attacked
randellrhodes: he attacks
randellrhodes: i activate lance
randellrhodes: he ends turn doesnt destroy
randellrhodes: i taget the golemn
randellrhodes: then he curses at me
Stemikey: oh now one shows up when i needed one of you guys for days
Stemikey: what you got connects or something
randellrhodes: https://imgur.com/5DLXT
randellrhodes: lol no
Stemikey: happy b ch
randellrhodes: any way
randellrhodes: u can stop cursing
randellrhodes: there is no reason to be rude
Shadow: you're recieving a warning stemikey
Shadow: now play correctly
randellrhodes: thank you shadow
Stemikey has left the duel

**plsgiveme500k** 2012-01-18, 07:49

When I duel with a 1100+ rate player... here goes the chat after I summon Quasar in my first turn...

Opponent: quasar is a dumbf*** dragon that nigat all sh** in 1 turn

*Opponent Rage Quited*

When I duel with plants... here goes the watcher after I summon Halberd...

Watchers: halberd is inferior/halberd sucks/halberd just a trash...

What do they want from me actually? Summon Quasar, I get cursed by people, Summon Halberd, I get cursed by people too... Suspect

**intothalight** 2012-01-18, 10:27

stop summoning strong synchro monsters first turn lol

Sponsored content