Re: Most Ridiculous Thing Somebody Has Said To You On Duel Network

**Optimus96** 2012-01-18, 13:39

intothalight wrote:stop summoning strong synchro monsters first turn lol

Thats like asking people to stop FTKing with Exodia or stop useing Rabbit and Tour Guide.

**MrJokster** 2012-01-18, 20:21

plsgiveme500k wrote:When I duel with a 1100+ rate player... here goes the chat after I summon Quasar in my first turn...

Opponent: quasar is a dumbf*** dragon that nigat all sh** in 1 turn

*Opponent Rage Quited*

When I duel with plants... here goes the watcher after I summon Halberd...

Watchers: halberd is inferior/halberd sucks/halberd just a trash...

What do they want from me actually? Summon Quasar, I get cursed by people, Summon Halberd, I get cursed by people too...

People don't like it when you play a good card and/or combo that they aren't used to and don't know how to combat or have no way of combating in their Deck

**Monox D. I-Fly** 2012-01-19, 05:38

plsgiveme500k wrote:
Monox D. I-Fly wrote:Well, I encountered cases like those at least twice. Dunno if I was right or wrong:

Case 1
I had three Star Boys on my field, so I said that their ATK was 2050. My opponent said that it didn't work like this. Their ATK should be just 1050. Which one was right?

Case 2
My opponent had two monsters and attacked my set Man-Eater Bug. However, before I flipped it, he attacked again with his other monster, resembled Direct Attack. When I flipped it, I said that he couldn't Direct Attack me anymore because I destroyed the second attacking monster with Man-Eater's Bug effect. Then he just destroyed the first one instead and said that it didn't a matter. Was he right? Or was I the right one? Does attack order affect circumstances like this?

For case 1... yes it does stack like active 3 solidarity...

For case 2... he can't change the man eater bug target... unless the player was play a six samurai deck...

Case 1
To be honest, I don't get what you mean by "stack". Bother to give me more explanation?

Case 2
He didn't change its effect target. He just change his attacking order since he seemed attempting to destroy my set card with 2 monsters at once.

**[EP] Irate** 2012-01-19, 07:40

This happened to me quite recently, when our beloved Lightning_Air_Matrix called me to his duel, and I see that his opponent actually cheated, and I decide to kick him. So, after that duel, that guy PMs me and tells me that he reported me to some guy named Aspirine. I then also decided to check the Ban Status of Aspirine, and I see that mentioned user has 7 Strikes, but that other guy insists that Aspirine is my superior, because of his Blue Name.
Ah, and later day, I am in a duel, someone claimed he added TKR to his hand, but had no proof for that, the game status didn't look that good for him, so I decide to have them continue or the guy who called quit if he doesn't want to play. He said that he wouldn't do either of those, so I kicked him. And he insults after that.
I mean, as if admins wouldn't know how to defend theirselves from users.

**Miror B.** 2012-01-19, 12:52

Monox D. I-Fly wrote:
plsgiveme500k wrote:
Monox D. I-Fly wrote:Well, I encountered cases like those at least twice. Dunno if I was right or wrong:

Case 1
I had three Star Boys on my field, so I said that their ATK was 2050. My opponent said that it didn't work like this. Their ATK should be just 1050. Which one was right?

Case 2
My opponent had two monsters and attacked my set Man-Eater Bug. However, before I flipped it, he attacked again with his other monster, resembled Direct Attack. When I flipped it, I said that he couldn't Direct Attack me anymore because I destroyed the second attacking monster with Man-Eater's Bug effect. Then he just destroyed the first one instead and said that it didn't a matter. Was he right? Or was I the right one? Does attack order affect circumstances like this?

For case 1... yes it does stack like active 3 solidarity...

For case 2... he can't change the man eater bug target... unless the player was play a six samurai deck...

Case 1
To be honest, I don't get what you mean by "stack". Bother to give me more explanation?

Case 2
He didn't change its effect target. He just change his attacking order since he seemed attempting to destroy my set card with 2 monsters at once.

1: Stack means both add up for even greater effect. Your Star Boys would "stack" and give a total boost of 1500 ATK.

2: Whichever attacked first is the one that attacked first. He is not allowed to change the order just because.

**Menace13** 2012-01-19, 21:51

You guys are lucky enough to have (some of) mine be in screenshot form.

3rd place: Anything Squiddy said
2nd place: GOD SPORE: https://imgur.com/a/rjvqN
1st place: Best call ever! https://i.imgur.com/YIUSu.jpg

**Harper7000** 2012-01-19, 22:10

Menace13 wrote:You guys are lucky enough to have (some of) mine be in screenshot form.

3rd place: Anything Squiddy said
2nd place: GOD SPORE: https://imgur.com/a/rjvqN
1st place: Best call ever! https://i.imgur.com/YIUSu.jpg

that's downright epic Most Ridiculous Thing Somebody Has Said To You On Duel Network - Page 4 2849847436

**Monox D. I-Fly** 2012-01-20, 02:59

Miror B. wrote:
Monox D. I-Fly wrote:
plsgiveme500k wrote:
Monox D. I-Fly wrote:Well, I encountered cases like those at least twice. Dunno if I was right or wrong:

Case 1
I had three Star Boys on my field, so I said that their ATK was 2050. My opponent said that it didn't work like this. Their ATK should be just 1050. Which one was right?

Case 2
My opponent had two monsters and attacked my set Man-Eater Bug. However, before I flipped it, he attacked again with his other monster, resembled Direct Attack. When I flipped it, I said that he couldn't Direct Attack me anymore because I destroyed the second attacking monster with Man-Eater's Bug effect. Then he just destroyed the first one instead and said that it didn't a matter. Was he right? Or was I the right one? Does attack order affect circumstances like this?

For case 1... yes it does stack like active 3 solidarity...

For case 2... he can't change the man eater bug target... unless the player was play a six samurai deck...

Case 1
To be honest, I don't get what you mean by "stack". Bother to give me more explanation?

Case 2
He didn't change its effect target. He just change his attacking order since he seemed attempting to destroy my set card with 2 monsters at once.

1: Stack means both add up for even greater effect. Your Star Boys would "stack" and give a total boost of 1500 ATK.

2: Whichever attacked first is the one that attacked first. He is not allowed to change the order just because.

Oh, OK. Thanks for clearing things up. So I was right in both case. (And I ended up quitting the game instead )

**intothalight** 2012-01-20, 03:20

lol ya the spore was kindda funny and stupid and the best call lol it happen to me the other day but he tried to mirror force my magic cylinder and was sitting there like good game well admit then i called an admin and well he called me a noob then left lol

**MrChillmatic** 2012-01-20, 05:15

Menace13 wrote:You guys are lucky enough to have (some of) mine be in screenshot form.

3rd place: Anything Squiddy said
2nd place: GOD SPORE: https://imgur.com/a/rjvqN
1st place: Best call ever! https://i.imgur.com/YIUSu.jpg

That Mirror Force bounce attack will never get old Laughing

**CheyMcFly** 2012-01-20, 05:29

MrChillmatic wrote:
Menace13 wrote:You guys are lucky enough to have (some of) mine be in screenshot form.

3rd place: Anything Squiddy said
2nd place: GOD SPORE: https://imgur.com/a/rjvqN
1st place: Best call ever! https://i.imgur.com/YIUSu.jpg

That Mirror Force bounce attack will never get old

okay all of those
made me die laughing
GOD SPOREEE

**Adept VantageSP** 2012-01-20, 05:30

"Admin he chet, he chet badly."

I will find you....

**CheyMcFly** 2012-01-20, 05:38

VantageSP wrote:"Admin he chet, he chet badly."

I will find you....

every time he says chet, I pretend it says Chey
"admin he Chey, he Chey badly"

**plsgiveme500k** 2012-01-20, 11:05

Menace13 wrote:You guys are lucky enough to have (some of) mine be in screenshot form.

3rd place: Anything Squiddy said
2nd place: GOD SPORE: https://imgur.com/a/rjvqN
1st place: Best call ever! https://i.imgur.com/YIUSu.jpg

Epic overlay ever... "Whole deck overlay.... Exceed summon THE GOD SPORE!!" I guess this is his summon chant...

**Key** 2012-01-21, 02:11

**Miror B.** 2012-01-21, 10:55

Key wrote:
._.

Key that was supposed to stay a secret!

**intothalight** 2012-01-21, 11:36

randellrhodes: wait
randellrhodes: replay occurs
randellrhodes: chain
randellrhodes: to laggia
shankz07 has lost 1600 life points
randellrhodes: call is gone
shankz07: eff of tg at end phase
randellrhodes: you caint
randellrhodes: you have missed timing
shankz07: so you missed the replay..
randellrhodes: https://imgur.com/GANAx
randellrhodes: lol
randellrhodes: you caint miss replay
randellrhodes has called an admin
randellrhodes: replay occurs when the number of monster on feild are changed
shankz07: wew..then suck out your lungs a$$ hole
shankz07 has left the duel

lol he said i miss timing in the replay when he used call of the haunted becuase he sent his monster after activating the call loll

**Heimdall** 2012-01-21, 16:21

I was dueling this one guy that was playing Infernities. He used Necromancer's effect while he had Doomcaliber Knight on the field. I told him Doomclaiber negates even the owner's effects, but he didn't budge until I called the Admin. I canceled the call when he placed everything back as it was before, so I thought it was fine. In the process, he asked me "how would you know?" and told him because I know rulings of certain monsters, and I even posted a link of the Wiki.

This guy was preying on newbs after the duel, but he got a surprise this time. lol

**Kiega000** 2012-01-21, 21:47

the whole thing if you're interested:

MissWitch: I'll let you slide because wanna hurry up.
Kiega: it's not sliding, it's the rules lol

I don't mind teaching something to someone if they actually had no idea about it, since some rules are kind of "wut" and not specifically stated on the card, but some responses are hilarious. Gusto vs Volcanic on that one.

**kangtuji** 2012-01-21, 22:08

Long time didn't see this thread.....

Did... the thread shrinked ?
(Seem it down up to 100+ pages... I thought it was like 150++ pages )
Most Ridiculous Thing Somebody Has Said To You On Duel Network - Page 4 Th_001_-v2

Most Ridiculous Thing Somebody Has Said To You On Duel Network - Page 4 Th_001_-v2

**KinRyuTen** 2012-01-22, 02:33

using a monster for a synchro summon is destroying.

**DefiniteOtaku** 2012-01-22, 02:41

KinRyuTen wrote:using a monster for a synchro summon is destroying.

Or Sacing...
I blame Tengu for this misconception.

**CheyMcFly** 2012-01-22, 03:20

DefiniteOtaku wrote:
KinRyuTen wrote:using a monster for a synchro summon is destroying.

Or Sacing...
I blame Tengu for this misconception.

but why he love youu

**KinRyuTen** 2012-01-22, 04:06

DefiniteOtaku wrote:
KinRyuTen wrote:using a monster for a synchro summon is destroying.

Or Sacing...
I blame Tengu for this misconception.

I'm pretty sure that this idiocy happened waaay before reborn tengu.

I even posted the sentence where it said on the wiki and the guy still didn't believe me, he was like "Dude just take the BLEEPING 600 dmg!" (obviously he didn't say bleeping).

**R4GEKILL** 2012-01-23, 01:45

One guy went first, Special Summoned Gravekeeper's Spy and Jigen Bakudan from his deck, overlayed them, typed ALLAH BAKALA BAKALA MUHAMMED JIHAD! Then quit

**Drago Arcaus** 2012-01-23, 03:47

Started duel

Opp: welp. you lose
Me:... Hmmm?? how exactly
Opp: simple... you remembered the game *trollface*
Me:...... Most Ridiculous Thing Somebody Has Said To You On Duel Network - Page 4 1234931504682

Most Ridiculous Thing Somebody Has Said To You On Duel Network - Page 4 1234931504682

**xXkillitwiththefireXx** 2012-01-23, 04:54

R4GEKILL wrote:One guy went first, Special Summoned Gravekeeper's Spy and Jigen Bakudan from his deck, overlayed them, typed ALLAH BAKALA BAKALA MUHAMMED JIHAD! Then quit

i lold so hard at this

**sagax06** 2012-01-23, 17:33

Me:*Activate dark hold*
Opp:*Solemn warning*
Me:YOu cant warning a dark hole...read it
opp:yes i can, YOU READ IT.
Me;Copy and paste card
Opp:*quits*
Very Happy

.

**CheyMcFly** 2012-01-23, 17:50

sagax06 wrote:Me:*Activate dark hold*
Opp:*Solemn warning*
Me:YOu cant warning a dark hole...read it
opp:yes i can, YOU READ IT.
Me;Copy and paste card
Opp:*quits*
.

I hate it when people don't understand that warning does not negate any spell/trap just because >_>.
they don't understand that it needs to special summon T_T

**sagax06** 2012-01-23, 20:43

CheyMcFly wrote:
sagax06 wrote:Me:*Activate dark hold*
Opp:*Solemn warning*
Me:YOu cant warning a dark hole...read it
opp:yes i can, YOU READ IT.
Me;Copy and paste card
Opp:*quits*
.

I hate it when people don't understand that warning does not negate any spell/trap just because >_>.
they don't understand that it needs to special summon T_T

scrubs have a bad habit of not reading there cards.smh.

**Twilight Sparkle** 2012-01-23, 21:18

I Wounder how many times my name is menctioned on here.... I mean ive said some stuipt things on dn Razz

...

Like Lyal Having priority
...

**Miror B.** 2012-01-23, 21:47

Twilight Sparkle wrote:I Wounder how many times my name is menctioned on here.... I mean ive said some stuipt things on dn ...

Like Lyal Having priority
...

Lyla can use priority! Very Happy

...just that you have to understand how her effect works and that changing to defense isn't a cost <.<

**LittleEagle** 2012-01-23, 22:16

Twilight Sparkle wrote:I Wounder how many times my name is menctioned on here.... I mean ive said some stuipt things on dn ...

Like Lyal Having priority
...

I'm an ex-English major and slight grammar nazi.
No offense, but I kept cringing when reading this. o-e

Also, on topic:
Opponent, multiple times on different moves that obviously work: "You're cheating."

...and I was the one who eventually quit after he drew an extra card and refused to put it back. :/

On a more light-hearted note, some girl (I think) tried to start cybering with me. It was really awkward. >.<

**sagax06** 2012-01-23, 22:30

LittleEagle wrote:
Twilight Sparkle wrote:I Wounder how many times my name is menctioned on here.... I mean ive said some stuipt things on dn ...

Like Lyal Having priority
...
I'm an ex-English major and slight grammar nazi.
No offense, but I kept cringing when reading this. o-e

Also, on topic:
Opponent, multiple times on different moves that obviously work: "You're cheating."

...and I was the one who eventually quit after he drew an extra card and refused to put it back. :/
cannot unsee.
On a more light-hearted note, some girl (I think) tried to start cybering with me. It was really awkward. >.<

**CheyMcFly** 2012-01-23, 22:38

LittleEagle wrote:
Twilight Sparkle wrote:I Wounder how many times my name is menctioned on here.... I mean ive said some stuipt things on dn ...

Like Lyal Having priority
...
I'm an ex-English major and slight grammar nazi.
No offense, but I kept cringing when reading this. o-e

Also, on topic:
Opponent, multiple times on different moves that obviously work: "You're cheating."

...and I was the one who eventually quit after he drew an extra card and refused to put it back. :/

On a more light-hearted note, some girl (I think) tried to start cybering with me. It was really awkward. >.<

It was probably a guy.
Or me.

**LittleEagle** 2012-01-23, 22:58

Haha! xD No, Chey, it was a girl named Logan.

...that still seems way to masculine a name to me, but the only Logan I know of was this older high school guy who lived across the street when I was really young...and Wolverine. >_>

**CheyMcFly** 2012-01-23, 23:07

LittleEagle wrote:Haha! xD No, Chey, it was a girl named Logan.

...that still seems way to masculine a name to me, but the only Logan I know of was this older high school guy who lived across the street when I was really young...and Wolverine. >_>

baha i'm just kidding
logan is a guy name as far as i know xD
also

me:Activate MST
opp: I use TKR effect to negate it

...
whut?

**intothalight** 2012-01-24, 02:40

The muhamd durka thing lol I just thought of Arabian neighbors an there five kids lol.

**Saturn** 2012-01-24, 12:51

Miror B. wrote:
Twilight Sparkle wrote:I Wounder how many times my name is menctioned on here.... I mean ive said some stuipt things on dn ...

Like Lyal Having priority
...
Lyla can use priority!

...just that you have to understand how her effect works and that changing to defense isn't a cost <.<

... You didn't get it did you?

**Szadek** 2012-01-24, 12:58

I summon Deep Sea and use her effect to summon Lost Blue Breaker,
then i use his effect.
My opponent says that i can't tribute him because i normal summoned his turn
...
...
WHAT?!?!?

**Miror B.** 2012-01-24, 15:17

Saturn wrote:
Miror B. wrote:
Twilight Sparkle wrote:I Wounder how many times my name is menctioned on here.... I mean ive said some stuipt things on dn ...

Like Lyal Having priority
...
Lyla can use priority!

...just that you have to understand how her effect works and that changing to defense isn't a cost <.<

... You didn't get it did you?

I did.

I just felt like explaining.

And OT:
Most Ridiculous Thing Somebody Has Said To You On Duel Network - Page 4 XTrdJ

...really?

**KinRyuTen** 2012-01-24, 15:54

quickdraw synchron + elemental hero neo alius = junk destroyer

**MysteriousDuelist** 2012-01-24, 21:15

Most Ridiculous Thing Somebody Has Said To You On Duel Network - Page 4 Dddmf

Heres the latest thing, things like this keep happening very often.... and suprizingly ppl with 600 , 800 or even 1000+ ratings..

But there are also some which are even beyond ridicilous.

One example of that would be when a guy told me I cant summon a 6 level monster tributing 1 because I need 2 tributes for it.

And its funny how none of them even check after you try to link them to the rulings they just leave and call u stupid or something.

**[S]tarstrike** 2012-01-24, 23:30

MysteriousDuelist wrote:
Spoiler:

Rofl. Way to blur out your name while your DN name is right under your avatar on this here forum, YamiAlen.

smh.

Most Ridiculous Thing Somebody Has Said To You On Duel Network - Page 4 CwWPC

Most Ridiculous Thing Somebody Has Said To You On Duel Network - Page 4 CwWPC

**CheyMcFly** 2012-01-24, 23:41

[S]tarstrike wrote:
MysteriousDuelist wrote:
Spoiler:

Rofl. Way to blur out your name while your DN name is right under your avatar on this here forum, YamiAlen.

smh.

I believe it is more polite to black out your opp's name.

**[S]tarstrike** 2012-01-24, 23:44

Maybe. In some situations, it could call for that. However, he blurred out the wrong name. He blurred out his own in the screenshot instead of his opponent's. Unless now we show up to ourselves as blue and at the top of the screen and can't see our own cards. O_o

I don't blur out names. I'm physically incapable of being polite. If you do something that merits a post about you in here, I wanna make sure everyone who reads this knows so they don't play you.

**D-Shinkirou** 2012-01-25, 11:58

Spoiler:

Most Ridiculous Thing Somebody Has Said To You On Duel Network - Page 4 LS97V

Thank goodness for admins.

I feel the highlight is where he say

---: omg you will learn someday such a noob lolz
---: but continue duel
---: my frnd
---: its ur go
GoD Shinkirou: We'll see as soon as a admin shows up who is correct

Why would I continue the duel when it would be invalid when the admin shows up. I even sent him a link to the rulings page.

**KidBlackWing** 2012-01-25, 16:30

Mirror Force Targets

0.o

**dabestgamer** 2012-01-26, 00:04

"torrent its a normal trap card speed 1"

...

...What?

**Drago Arcaus** 2012-01-26, 14:51

You cant call priority on Alexandrites effect because its banished by bottomless...

Apparently tributing as a cost on chain link 1 is mystically stopped by bottomless

Took ages explaining how this would work too

Sponsored content