DN Clan Suggestion/question

I've always wondered this but why are dn clans only limited to 11 members? Shouldnt a clan be able to Recruit as many people as they want and do as many wars as they want for the sake of enjoyment? A clan should be able to recruit as many people as it needs to grow bigger and stronger. The 11 member rule is quite...stupid lmao. What im asking is why do we have this rule. And we should def get a rid of it.

Limit is actually 13

ancientman7 wrote:Limit is actually 13

your either trolling or I never realized this. regardess it doesn't change the fact the limit should be removed.

Then clans would just grow for the sake of growing, get more inactivity and some people will never see wartime. Clans are more than clans alone, they are teams working together. Teams have to stay manageable.

Clans/guilds should absolutely have no upper limit, as this places an arbitrary limitation on the social meaning of being a part of one.

But competitive teams in pretty much everything (e.g. sports) always have an upper limit in the number of competitors.

So in conclusion, you can make a clan as big as you want, but if you want to compete in DN events, you need to form a specific core team.

Ultimate lol wrote:Then clans would just grow for the sake of growing, get more inactivity and some people will never see wartime. Clans are more than clans alone, they are teams working together. Teams have to stay manageable.

well thats just how the leader manages his/her clan. If there was say, a 20 member war limit at least there could be 4 wars going on once and that would make clans a lot more interesting.
EDIT;However i still don't think there should be a limit. I think its up to the leader to decide how many people he can handle and grow there. For the inactivity part I have no idea what you mean by that. If a member is inactive boot him out, and I honestly don't think someone's going to aim to make a 50 person clan right off the bat.

I'll see what I can do about the limit, an even 15 is what I'm hoping for... infinite would be pointless and take away the decisions of the Team/Clan Leader of who is gonna be an official War Contender. You can have as many Team/Clan Members, but they just can't participate in official wars.

Zero2Hero wrote:I'll see what I can do about the limit, an even 15 is what I'm hoping for... infinite would be pointless
e_e

well I was just throwing it out there since 13 members is a bit low for a "clan". lol. and i don't think infinite would be bad, I just think leaders would have to think and manage there teams accordingly.

sagax06 wrote:

Zero2Hero wrote:I'll see what I can do about the limit, an even 15 is what I'm hoping for... infinite would be pointless
e_e

well I was just throwing it out there since 13 members is a bit low for a "clan". lol. and i don't think infinite would be bad, I just think leaders would have to think and manage there teams accordingly.

Being in a clan would be meaning nothing anymore cause you can just take anyone in. There is no limit anyway right? Like I said, clans would just grow for the sake of growing. A limit should stay.

Actually I have a better suggestion. Banish all the teams and restart forming teams and have a new ranking system. Plus rankings should be reset every first day of the banists. Capacity should be at least 15 like what zero mentioned to me since there are lots of ppl on the forum.

ancientman7 wrote:Actually I have a better suggestion. Banish all the teams and restart forming teams and have a new ranking system. Plus rankings should be reset every first day of the banists. Capacity should be at least 15 like what zero mentioned to me since there are lots of ppl on the forum.

or..how about just restart the team records? lmao banishing them all is kind of pointless.....however if we can even move it at 15 it would be better.

No one is forcing you to have 13 Members, you can have 580 members if you want however only 13 of them can participate in wars(changes are allowed if a judge is previously contacted). There are reasons for the limit.

I just have a question, are we discussing CLANS or TEAMS? At some point you all started to confuse yourself and things got wacky.

Badass_Bunny wrote:No one is forcing you to have 13 Members, you can have 580 members if you want however only 13 of them can participate in wars(changes are allowed if a judge is previously contacted). There are reasons for the limit.

that should be moved higher the make teams have more wars.13 is very low for a war roster.

I've talked to TamB about this before, if we do increase the maximum, it would go as high as 20, no more than that.

15 seems more reasonable than 20

Zero2Hero wrote:15 seems more reasonable than 20

well you have to think about how many more wars could be done, and how much for active the clans would likley be.

sagax06 wrote:

Zero2Hero wrote:15 seems more reasonable than 20

well you have to think about how many more wars could be done, and how much for active the clans would likley be.

more wars=more fighting when a problem arises= more pain for the mods

I think the format should expand to TCG only, OCG only and TCG/OCG. Creates less problems if both are allowed in wars.

Red_Chaos wrote:

sagax06 wrote:

Zero2Hero wrote:15 seems more reasonable than 20

well you have to think about how many more wars could be done, and how much for active the clans would likley be.

more wars=more fighting when a problem arises= more pain for the mods

or A.They can read the rules on the questionnaire clan thingy that tamA made.
or B. If there is a ruling question, then you have this wonderful thing called google. more people should try using it. C. honestly is not a good excuse. More problems for the mods? if they dont want to do there job(s) other people are willing too lmao.

15 is a more fitting number than 13 or 20. 15 cards in a Side or Fusion Deck, Yugi was 15 when he solved the Millennium Puzzle, DN boots you off after 15 minutes, etc. Having no limit to the number of people fighting would probably make things difficult.