Royal Decree

Opinions? I like putting 3 in my monster/spell heavy decks.

It's a good trap for decks that are really fast paced or decks that are not trap reliant to set certain moves up but an any other deck I just think of it as a dead draw.

It's too risky this format, and in general, I prefer Trap Stun myself

Not even worth running against Chain burn because they'll just steam roll past it with Fairy Wind.

I sometimes prefer side it in aggro deck, but I pretty much never main it.

I always seem to have this card in my sidedeck on DN. Even with all my spell/trap destruction I don't like running into decks that are heavy trap based still.

I use 2 Decree's, if i have to, or to side. Good for 6Sam's, this, +Naturia Beast, it's just pwnage. Or a spellcaster deck, maybe.

i used to play this on junkdoppel to have more space on deck (3 of this on deck and no other traps) but with MST at 3, hyperion, inzectors, heavy and some more cards that destroys traps this card is dame dame

I agree with Bunny. And as a Saber Player i love trap stuns

That doesn't look like the fat tyrant....

Side deck staple at 3?

mido9 wrote:Side deck staple at 3?

No...

I prefer Trap Stun to this, specially in those "big one turn plays" formats we're having right now, which allows me to execute a big play and having Solemns and other annoying things ready for my opponent in the next one.

Dart wrote:I prefer Trap Stun to this, specially in those "big one turn plays" formats we're having right now, which allows me to execute a big play and having Solemns and other annoying things ready for my opponent in the next one.

Trap stun is an on and off. I loved Sabers while maining Oppression you could turn it off for the turn with trap stun